ADR war: Re: Sat-Topic

• From: Torsten.Tuschick@E-Technik.TU-Ilmenau.DE (T. Tuschick)
• Date: Tue, 18 Feb 1997 08:05:43 +0100 (MET)
• From owner-sat-topic@tags1.dn.net Tue Feb 18 02: 09:05 1997

> 
> >Ein kleiner Wermutstropfen bleibt bei ADR allerdings: Hat schon einmal
> >jemand einen Vergleichstest mit Hin- und Herschalten zwischen dem gleichen
> >Programm via DSR und ADR gemacht? Ich finde - natuerlich ganz subjektiv -,
> >es gibt doch merkbare Unterschiede zugunsten von DSR!
> >
> >Viele Gruesse,
> >Stefan Stra_burger (stefan.strassburger@t-online.de)
> >
> I have my Triasat adr 50 (aka astrastar ax1) connected via the digital
> output to the DA-converter in my CD-player, it improves the sound quality
> greatly - but a real CD still sounds better.
> 
> Zapping through the free adr-stations and the dmx-channels it is my
> impression that many broadcasters could improve the sound quality of their
> broadcasts in adr. A minority of the stations have a far superior sound
> quality. 
> 
> DSR should have the technical best quality, but if the majority of ADR
> broadcasters improved the quality of the sound they intend to broadcast in
> ADR, the audible difference between the 2 systems would be insignificant to
> most listeners.    
> 
> 
> btw. I have no problems at all reading German.
> 
> Henrik 
> 
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Torsten Tuschick
email: tt@sat-net.com

• Prev: Qualitaetsuntereschiede ADR/DSR/UKW
• Next: Mailliste
• Index: SAT-topic mailing list
• Thread: Mail Thread Index